-
Peter Martens deposited Response to Mark Edwards in the group
Origen on Humanities Commons 4 years, 1 month ago
My essay highlights differences between how Edwards and I approach ancient sources and the scholarship on them. My response also provides a dossier of a dozen or so passages where Origen portrays paradise as a divine or incorporeal place, distinct from this earth, and as a residence for pre-existent rational creatures. Edwards denies such a portrait.
-
Peter Martens deposited Response to Mark Edwards in the group
Late Antiquity on Humanities Commons 4 years, 1 month ago
My essay highlights differences between how Edwards and I approach ancient sources and the scholarship on them. My response also provides a dossier of a dozen or so passages where Origen portrays paradise as a divine or incorporeal place, distinct from this earth, and as a residence for pre-existent rational creatures. Edwards denies such a portrait.
-
My essay highlights differences between how Edwards and I approach ancient sources and the scholarship on them. My response also provides a dossier of a dozen or so passages where Origen portrays paradise as a divine or incorporeal place, distinct from this earth, and as a residence for pre-existent rational creatures. Edwards denies such a portrait.
-
Peter Martens's profile was updated on Humanities Commons 4 years, 1 month ago
-
Peter Martens deposited Revisiting the Allegory/Typology Distinction: The Case of Origen in the group
Religious Studies on Humanities Commons 6 years ago
There is a significant debate in Origenian scholarship today about the allegory/typology distinction. Some scholars accept the demarcation between these two forms of nonliteral scriptural interpretation, whereas others reject it. In this paper I seek to determine whether, or to what extent, the allegory/typology distinction is valid for study of…[Read more]
-
Peter Martens deposited Revisiting the Allegory/Typology Distinction: The Case of Origen in the group
Christian Mysticism on Humanities Commons 6 years ago
There is a significant debate in Origenian scholarship today about the allegory/typology distinction. Some scholars accept the demarcation between these two forms of nonliteral scriptural interpretation, whereas others reject it. In this paper I seek to determine whether, or to what extent, the allegory/typology distinction is valid for study of…[Read more]
-
Peter Martens deposited Revisiting the Allegory/Typology Distinction: The Case of Origen in the group
Christian Apocryphal Literature on Humanities Commons 6 years ago
There is a significant debate in Origenian scholarship today about the allegory/typology distinction. Some scholars accept the demarcation between these two forms of nonliteral scriptural interpretation, whereas others reject it. In this paper I seek to determine whether, or to what extent, the allegory/typology distinction is valid for study of…[Read more]
-
Peter Martens created the group
Origen on Humanities Commons 6 years ago
-
Peter Martens deposited Revisiting the Allegory/Typology Distinction: The Case of Origen on Humanities Commons 6 years ago
There is a significant debate in Origenian scholarship today about the allegory/typology distinction. Some scholars accept the demarcation between these two forms of nonliteral scriptural interpretation, whereas others reject it. In this paper I seek to determine whether, or to what extent, the allegory/typology distinction is valid for study of…[Read more]
-
Peter Martens's profile was updated on Humanities Commons 6 years ago