<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>MLA Commons | David A. Golumbia | Activity</title>
	<link>https://mla.hcommons.org/members/dgolumbia/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://mla.hcommons.org/members/dgolumbia/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for David A. Golumbia.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 11:10:43 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=10.6.0</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">90aba9fb59a71ffc46d673db7f1cba4e</guid>
				<title>David A. Golumbia commented on the post, Statement on Public Access to Federally Funded Research, on the site Scholarly Communication @ MLA</title>
				<link>http://scholcomm.mla.hcommons.org/statement-on-public-access-to-federally-funded-research/#comment-329</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 21:00:30 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a remarkable response given what others have written above. The White House OSTP directive is aimed at (1) science and technology research, of which the MLA is neither, under formal, informal, [&hellip;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">2b9272558e69ea67ae82ac59d92ab904</guid>
				<title>David A. Golumbia commented on the post, Statement on Public Access to Federally Funded Research, on the site Scholarly Communication @ MLA</title>
				<link>http://scholcomm.mla.hcommons.org/statement-on-public-access-to-federally-funded-research/#comment-325</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 15:37:58 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What concerns me about this reply is that it is not responsive either to the issues in Kathleen&#8217;s original post, or in my reply to it. I have a lot to say about these matters, but I don&#8217;t want to complicate [&hellip;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">0b26f3faf25b134aefbe496b17204b3b</guid>
				<title>David A. Golumbia commented on the post, Statement on Public Access to Federally Funded Research, on the site Scholarly Communication @ MLA</title>
				<link>http://scholcomm.mla.hcommons.org/statement-on-public-access-to-federally-funded-research/#comment-305</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 17:35:17 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with a great deal in this statement, and as a long-time member of the MLA, I appreciate it. </p>
<p>Given the context, I wonder if it might not have been, and might not be in similar contexts in the future, [&hellip;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>