<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>MLA Commons | Andreas Vrahimis | Activity</title>
	<link>https://mla.hcommons.org/members/andreasvrahimis/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://mla.hcommons.org/members/andreasvrahimis/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Andreas Vrahimis.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2026 09:13:19 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=10.6.0</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">72ff53b49594d6abe22037268690b29a</guid>
				<title>Andreas Vrahimis deposited Another way of parting:  Horkheimer, Schlick, Bergson in the group Philosophy</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1897770/</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2024 03:00:18 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Despite its formative influence on the subsequent emergence of a supposed ‘divide’ between ‘analytic’ and ‘continental’ philosophy, the clash between the phenomenological tradition and early analytic philosophy is only a small part of a much broader, complex, and multi-faceted ‘parting of the ways’ between various strands of interwar German&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1897770"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1897770/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">f308735e513bb24fe9e0c91d57682f59</guid>
				<title>Andreas Vrahimis deposited Another way of parting</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1897756/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2024 20:38:55 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Despite its formative influence on the subsequent emergence of a supposed ‘divide’ between ‘analytic’ and ‘continental’ philosophy, the clash between the phenomenological tradition and early analytic philosophy is only a small part of a much broader, complex, and multi-faceted ‘parting of the ways’ between various strands of interwar German&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1897756"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1897756/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">4a3f9f3475a17e2d3041897e15dba273</guid>
				<title>Andreas Vrahimis&#039;s profile was updated</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1829982/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2023 12:10:35 -0500</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">d1f7b795dcefc60826aa13914bf28ab1</guid>
				<title>Andreas Vrahimis deposited Wittgenstein, Loos, and the Critique of Ornament in the group Philosophy</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1787364/</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jul 2022 02:24:37 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adolf Loos is one of the few figures that Wittgenstein explicitly named as an influence on his thought. Loos’s influence has been debated in the context of determining Wittgenstein’s relation to modernism, as well as in attempts to come to terms with his work as an architect. This paper looks in a different direction, examining a remark in whi&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1787364"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1787364/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">e7d2befff5fca6e57ff81eaae62c2032</guid>
				<title>Andreas Vrahimis&#039;s profile was updated</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1787340/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2022 21:22:57 -0400</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">5e6790dd8edb72c0fe213bd53688cd8b</guid>
				<title>Andreas Vrahimis deposited Wittgenstein, Loos, and the Critique of Ornament</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1787338/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2022 21:18:45 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adolf Loos is one of the few figures that Wittgenstein explicitly named as an influence on his thought. Loos’s influence has been debated in the context of determining Wittgenstein’s relation to modernism, as well as in attempts to come to terms with his work as an architect. This paper looks in a different direction, examining a remark in whi&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1787338"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1787338/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">5f7ed0ad1feeef46aecd2388805cf4ba</guid>
				<title>Andreas Vrahimis deposited The Vienna Circle's Reception of Nietzsche in the group Philosophy</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1714772/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2020 02:23:38 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Friedrich Nietzsche was among the figures from the history of nineteenth-century philosophy that, perhaps surprisingly, some of the Vienna Circle’s members had presented as one of their predecessors. While, primarily for political reasons, most Anglophone figures in the history of analytic philosophy had taken a dim view of Nietzsche, the Vienna C&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1714772"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1714772/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">46d6a8f30e537a32d52f2d086aee3df4</guid>
				<title>Andreas Vrahimis&#039;s profile was updated</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1714684/</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2020 11:36:10 -0400</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">de00895e2fe15a42a92e7c7a0ebaebc0</guid>
				<title>Andreas Vrahimis deposited The Vienna Circle's Reception of Nietzsche</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1714683/</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2020 11:33:47 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Friedrich Nietzsche was among the figures from the history of nineteenth-century philosophy that, perhaps surprisingly, some of the Vienna Circle’s members had presented as one of their predecessors. While, primarily for political reasons, most Anglophone figures in the history of analytic philosophy had taken a dim view of Nietzsche, the Vienna C&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1714683"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1714683/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">6a455cefa35204eeb5948efc06aa643e</guid>
				<title>Andreas Vrahimis deposited Wittgenstein and Heidegger against a Science of Aesthetics in the group Philosophy</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1692582/</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2020 16:27:37 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wittgenstein’s and Heidegger’s objections against the possibility of a science of aesthetics were influential on different sides of the analytic/continental divide. Heidegger’s anti-scientism leads him to an alētheic view of artworks which precedes and exceeds any possible aesthetic reduction. Wittgenstein also rejects the relevance of causal&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1692582"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1692582/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">6731c9f8a40cf8413856e86ecd38a404</guid>
				<title>Andreas Vrahimis&#039;s profile was updated</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1692474/</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2020 10:15:26 -0400</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">0c7c258a8b345c520430f7742de5136e</guid>
				<title>Andreas Vrahimis deposited Wittgenstein and Heidegger against a Science of Aesthetics</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1692473/</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2020 10:14:06 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wittgenstein’s and Heidegger’s objections against the possibility of a science of aesthetics were influential on different sides of the analytic/continental divide. Heidegger’s anti-scientism leads him to an alētheic view of artworks which precedes and exceeds any possible aesthetic reduction. Wittgenstein also rejects the relevance of causal&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1692473"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1692473/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">bde0550117e616fa199d45790e910808</guid>
				<title>Andreas Vrahimis deposited "Was There a Sun Before Men Existed?": A. J. Ayer and French Philosophy in the fifties</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1692472/</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2020 10:11:30 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In contrast to many of his contemporaries, A. J. Ayer was an analytic philosopher who had sustained throughout his career some interest in developments in the work of his ‘continental’ peers. Ayer, who spoke French, held friendships with some important Parisian intellectuals, such as Camus, Bataille, Wahl and Merleau-Ponty. This paper examines the&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1692472"><a href="https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1692472/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">ff14a52ee3e58ad75dde99825f6bc038</guid>
				<title>Andreas Vrahimis&#039;s profile was updated</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1571643/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2017 10:59:11 -0400</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">43c34b19cd65fb2346a1d11b259b1527</guid>
				<title>Andreas Vrahimis changed their profile picture</title>
				<link>https://hcommons.org/activity/p/1571642/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2017 10:53:14 -0400</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>