ACLA 2022 Seminar CFP: Intermediality & the Transboundary in S & SE Asia
1 voice, 0 replies
Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
Viewing 1 post (of 1 total)
- Only members can participate in this group's discussions.
Intermediality and the Transboundary in South and Southeast Asia
A Seminar Proposal for the American Comparative Literature Association (ACLA)
Annual Conference, National Taiwan University, Taipei, June 15-18, 2022
Deadline for Submission: October 31, 2021 at 11:59 p.m. PST
To submit an abstract for this seminar, please visit: https://www.acla.org/intermediality-and-transboundary-south-and-southeast-asia
This panel looks at inter-Asia intermediality through the lens of the transboundary in the understudied subregions of South and Southeast Asia. The concept of ‘transboundary’ has gained importance in South and Southeast Asia because of urgent ecological issues such as water, drought, fire, and pollution, which have troubled the different nations that share common skies and rivers. Conventional frameworks of nationalism and regionalism have failed to adequately address such intertwined environmental and geopolitical concerns because they frustrate cross-cultural cooperation and reproduce long-standing hierarchies. Seen this way, the ‘transboundary’ might offer a possible means for thinking critically and comparatively about inter-Asian connections and reciprocities beyond the limits of existing frameworks.
While national sovereignty has served as the dominant paradigm for studying political, ecological, and media cultures in South and Southeast Asia, the transboundary commons offer a blueprint for imagining the transnational, cross-border, and intraregional interactions, disparities, and frictions among different media platforms and cultural formations. First, the transboundary in South and Southeast Asia can be thought of in terms of interregionality, as proponents of inter-Asia cultural studies, or “Asia as method,” have challenged the institutional hegemony of East-West bilateralism in the knowledge production of culture by emphasizing interreferentiality across multiple locations and scales. Second, the transboundary can be thought of in terms of intermediality, as writings about this emergent arena of inquiry have aspired to comprehend the technological innovations in the infrastructures and networks for media convergence, circulation, and consumption, which have resulted in media hybridization. However, their ideas have not always taken into account the variance and unevenness of transmedia content across diverse local, national, regional, and global conditions.
We welcome proposals from interdisciplinary scholars who grapple with the diverse entanglements of intermediality and the transboundary on the local, national, regional, and global scales. For example, proposed papers might examine microblogging, live-streaming, video-sharing, cinematographic and televisual media, multimedia art, data sharing technology, video games, and music videos in relation to cross-border migration and tourism, transnational racial and religious identities, feminist and LGBTQ+ activism, regional co-production, celebrity culture, multilingual code-mixing, and transboundary ecological problems. Papers should try to address at least one of the following questions: How do conditions and processes of intermediality break up homogeneous or regionally-bounded ideas of Asia? How do transboundary productions and circulations unsettle homogeneous or disciplinary-bounded forms of media?
This seminar is co-organized by Elmo Gonzaga (Chinese U of Hong Kong) and Brian Bernards (U of Southern California). Our discussant will be Ben Tran (Vanderbilt U).