-
Logical academic argumentation: Hybridization of competing epistemological and logical methodologies for doctoral research
- Author(s):
- Carlo Morelli (see profile)
- Date:
- 2021
- Subject(s):
- Logic, Research--Methodology, Digital humanities, Research, Methodology, Universities and colleges--Graduate work
- Item Type:
- Article
- Tag(s):
- doctoral, doctoral training, graduate research training, student writing development
- Permanent URL:
- http://dx.doi.org/10.17613/5ksn-d269
- Abstract:
- Original doctoral research requires a niche contribution to a boundless, colossal, and prodigious corpus of existing scholarship. The efficacy of original research is grounded in the justification of its thesis through meticulous research and defensive justification. This article presents the doctoral researcher with two algorithmic stepwise processes by which an argument, proposal, theme, or thesis may be rigorously defended and justified using logical argumentation. Justification for quantitative and qualitative research conclusions are grounded in deductive and inductive frameworks using positive and interpretive methods, respectively. A practical, hybrid synthesis of these two competing frameworks is proposed and empirical validation of data through statistical analysis is summarized.
- Metadata:
- xml
- Status:
- Published
- Last Updated:
- 12 months ago
- License:
- All Rights Reserved
- Share this:
Downloads
Item Name: 
topic_4_dq_2_res-815-0503_morelli_08302021.pdfDownload View in browser Activity: Downloads: 35
An online community for MLA members