-
The transformative power of values-enacted scholarship
- Author(s):
- Nicky Agate (see profile) , Rebecca Kennison (see profile) , Stacy Konkiel (see profile) , Christopher P. Long (see profile) , Jason Rhody (see profile) , Simone Sacchi (see profile) , Penelope Weber (see profile)
- Date:
- 2020
- Group(s):
- (IOI) Future of Open Scholarship project, Digital Humanists, Library & Information Science, TC Digital Humanities, TM Libraries and Research
- Subject(s):
- Education, Higher, Evaluation, Research--Evaluation
- Item Type:
- Article
- Tag(s):
- Evaluation, metrics, values, Academe, Altmetrics, Assessment, Humanities metrics, Research impact, Scholarly communication
- Permanent URL:
- http://dx.doi.org/10.17613/6cxe-4z97
- Abstract:
- The current mechanisms by which scholars and their work are evaluated across higher education are unsustainable and, we argue, increasingly corrosive. Relying on a limited set of proxy measures, current systems of evaluation fail to recognize and reward the many dependencies upon which a healthy scholarly ecosystem relies. Drawing on the work of the HuMetricsHSS Initiative, this essay argues that by aligning values with practices, recognizing the vital processes that enrich the work produced, and grounding our indicators of quality in the degree to which we in the academy live up to the values for which we advocate, a values-enacted approach to research production and evaluation has the capacity to reshape the culture of higher education.
- Notes:
- The HuMetricsHSS project is funded by the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation.
- Metadata:
- xml
- Published as:
- Journal article
- Status:
- Published
- Last Updated:
- 2 years ago
- License:
- Attribution
- Share this:
An online community for MLA members
s41599-020-00647-z.pdf