-
The humanities do not need a replication drive
- Author(s):
- Sarah de Rijcke (see profile) , J. Britt Holbrook (see profile) , Bart Penders (see profile)
- Date:
- 2019
- Group(s):
- HuMetricsHSS, Philosophy, Public Philosophy Journal, Science and Technology Studies (STS), Science Studies and the History of Science
- Subject(s):
- Finance, Philosophy, Research--Methodology, Science--Study and teaching, Technology--Study and teaching
- Item Type:
- Blog Post
- Tag(s):
- future of the humanities, replicability, replication, Funding/Private funding, Research methods, Scholarly communication, STS
- Permanent URL:
- http://dx.doi.org/10.17613/njd0-9029
- Abstract:
- Argues that the humanities do not need a replication drive like that being pushed for in the sciences.
- Notes:
- This deposit is a post print version of a blog post on the CWTS Blog at Leiden University: https://www.cwts.nl/blog?article=n-r2v2a4&title=the-humanities-do-not-need-a-replication-drive.
- Metadata:
- xml
- Published as:
- Online publication
- Status:
- Published
- Last Updated:
- 5 years ago
- License:
- Attribution
- Share this:
Downloads
Item Name: 
humanities_undesirable_replication_drive_cwts_blog_fin.pdfDownload View in browser Activity: Downloads: 184
An online community for MLA members